Supreme Court Rules on Bankruptcy Case Involving Automatic Stay
Supreme Court Rules on Bankruptcy Case Involving Automatic Stay

In Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, , 589 U.S. ___ (2020), the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled that where a creditor seeks "relief" from the "automatic stay" in a bankruptcy case and is denied that relief, the creditor...

READ MORE
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case Analysis
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case Analysis

How a Chapter 7 Trustee may settle (or not settle) claims of a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Debtor A recent case out of a Bankruptcy Court in Massachusetts highlights some important rights and restraints of a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee. In...

READ MORE
Court Holds IRS, Which Violated Automatic Stay, Must Pay Bankruptcy Debtors Damages For Emotional Distress
Court Holds IRS, Which Violated Automatic Stay, Must Pay Bankruptcy Debtors Damages For Emotional Distress

The United States Bankruptcy Code, when used in a timely and systematic way, is a powerful law that may allow both consumer and business debtors to wipe out some debts and to substantially restructure others.  To protect the filing debtor...

READ MORE
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: List it or Lose It: Debtor Who Fails to Disclose Claim May Lose That Claim
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: List it or Lose It: Debtor Who Fails to Disclose Claim May Lose That Claim

One of the first things we advise all of our clients about filing bankruptcy is the requirement that a debtor disclose all required information.   Whether filing a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, Chapter 11 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, the Bankruptcy...

READ MORE
U.S. Supreme Court Holds Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Debtor Who Deceived Attorneys Can Discharge Fees Owed
U.S. Supreme Court Holds Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Debtor Who Deceived Attorneys Can Discharge Fees Owed

"Honestly is the best policy”.   While the origins of the phrase are arguably linked to Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and even as far back as William Shakespeare, recent history and daily events lead many to believe that those whose conduct...

READ MORE
Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Debtor Required to Dispute Legally Unenforceable Proof of Claim
Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Debtor Required to Dispute Legally Unenforceable Proof of Claim

Supreme Court Holds that Debt Collector Who Filed a Claim in the Bankruptcy Court Barred by the Statue of Limitations Did Not Violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U. S. C. §1692 et seq. In Midland Funding, v....

READ MORE
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case and New Jersey Wage Garnishments
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case and New Jersey Wage Garnishments

  Bankruptcy Court Holds Consumer Debtor’s Wages, Garnished Within 90 Day Period Prior to Filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, Are a Preference A recent decision, Tower Credit, Inc. v. Schott (In re Jackson), 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4369, is highlights one...

READ MORE
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case Highlights Conflict of Public Policy in Bankruptcy Code
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case Highlights Conflict of Public Policy in Bankruptcy Code

Former CEO Who Filed Chapter 7 Personal Bankruptcy Denied Discharge of Debt Owed to Employees by Insolvent Corporation The Bankruptcy Code provisions relating to a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy case seek to achieve two objectives which frequently conflict with one another. ...

READ MORE
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy:  Failure to Discharge Judgment Liens Can Be Costly Error
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Failure to Discharge Judgment Liens Can Be Costly Error

A case decided by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit, In re: McCoy, No. 15-8056 (6th Cir. 2016), illustrates why New Jersey attorneys representing debtors filing a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Petition diligently do their "homework"...

READ MORE
New Jersey Foreclosure Dismissed Based on Statute of Limitations: The “Free House” Debate Continues
New Jersey Foreclosure Dismissed Based on Statute of Limitations: The “Free House” Debate Continues

A Bergen County New Jersey Chancery Court has dismissed a mortgage foreclosure action ruling that the action was filed outside the Statute of Limitations.    See Anim Investment Co. v. Shaloub, F-30508-18 (Ch. Div. June 30, 2016).  Bergen County Superior Court...

READ MORE